BBC – “Drugs policy in England ‘doomed to failure’”

    The story is here and has been vigorously promoted all day long by the BBC, far in excess of the attention it gave to the Global Commission report.

    It is a deception.

    This “study” is thinly disguised government propaganda.  It perfectly supports the thrust of the Home Office’s disastrous 2010 drug strategy.  It is a prohibitionist’s wet dream.  Kathy Gyngell, the woman behind it has no serious credentials at all.  She is from the Melanie Philips and Peter Hitchens mould.   The “Centre for Policy Studies” is a sham.  It has no independence or authority.  This is a puritanical, moralistic, authoritarian idea of “thou shalt not” – the dumbest idea of all.   It aims for abstinence rather than harm reduction but the thing most absent from it is any intelligence at all.   It is a stupid idea.

    I’m going to let our cowardly, two-faced politicians off the hook a little though.  I think this policy comes from a bigoted, stubborn establishment in the bowels of the Home Office.   It is uncanny how the ignorant  and immoral policy of prohibition persists and transcends party politics.  There is a deeply entrenched and malign civil service influence here which encourages polticians’ cowardice and  needs to be rooted out and replaced with some 21st century thinking.

    • http://twitter.com/UKCIA UKCIA

      I can’t find the original on the CPS site anywhere. Indeed, if you go to
      http://www.cps.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=cpsarticle&id=62&Itemid=37
      policy areas: prisons and addiction – there’s a link “For a detailed critique of Government drugs policy,” which points to a dead page.

      I thought it was going to be another of Gyngell’s blogs, but her last one was some time ago.

      Any idea what’s going on?

      Derek

    • http://twitter.com/UKCIA UKCIA

      I can’t find the original on the CPS site anywhere. Indeed, if you go to
      http://www.cps.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=cpsarticle&id=62&Itemid=37
      policy areas: prisons and addiction – there’s a link “For a detailed critique of Government drugs policy,” which points to a dead page.

      I thought it was going to be another of Gyngell’s blogs, but her last one was some time ago.

      Any idea what’s going on?

      Derek

    • Anonymous

      This is worrying.. it supports the governments short-sighted policy just a bit too much doesn’t it.. I have no idea where these figures come from… how on earth does Methadone cost £730m a year? http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/nov/16/drugs-methadone-rehab-heroin-addiction states that 2.4 million Methadone prescriptions cost £27m.. so ~£0.01125 per dose… £730m is quite the jump and using her number of 153,000 being prescribed Methadone at ’07 prices, that is around 380,000 doses per user per year or just over 1000 per user per day. The numbers don’t add up! Nothing on the CPS blog.. Kathy is really having her moment at the expense of the most vulnerable of society.. something really doesn’t seem right here.

    • alan.

      Yes I completly agree peter, suddenly from no coverage at all of the global commission report to this.
      They seem to be coming to the subject from a cost cutting direction and not the health issue it actually is.

      Your mate hitchens was on BBC1 this morning, the big question 10am, will be on iplayer by now. Reading his body language during this show it seems very obvious that he has no confidence in what he is saying- he never makes eye contact with the people he is talking to, totally disrespectful imho.

      Another thing I noticed about the BBC coverage today is the pics they show during the piece- white powder, needles and pints of lager. Funny how alcohol is now a dangerous substance when its costing the taxpayer money….

      I’ve also noticed that when MPs talk about drugs and drug policy they start their sentence with ‘we can’t talk about harm reduction blah blah’ – well I want to know exactly why they can’t talk about harm reduction…?
      Would this mean they’re admiting there’s another way to deal with this other than the grange hill method?…

      Just say no….

      The mind boggles ;)