<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom of Information Request &#8211; re; Mr Cameron&#8217;s Comments on Medicinal Cannabis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/</link>
	<description>Cannabis Law Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=374</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leech Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Leech Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-2220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok lets all start calling it a generic name of indicvex shall we? By reading this article you would expect the government to listen to what the call experts in the field, so why oh why did the top bods (such as professor David Nut etc ) resign because the government don&#039;t listen to them? They obviously don&#039;t listen to a single word without their fingers in their ears other wise it would already be legal! Harmfull in the raw state, oh yes which is why the American, British and other national advisors have classed it in there words &#039;less harmful And addictive than caffeine! Come on British government, we are all getting quote insulted with your lack of knowledge on this subject dispite the evidence by &#039;professionals&#039; at your finger tips! We are also so SICK of the fact you take us for idiots!!!!!! Wake up you cretins!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok lets all start calling it a generic name of indicvex shall we? By reading this article you would expect the government to listen to what the call experts in the field, so why oh why did the top bods (such as professor David Nut etc ) resign because the government don&#8217;t listen to them? They obviously don&#8217;t listen to a single word without their fingers in their ears other wise it would already be legal! Harmfull in the raw state, oh yes which is why the American, British and other national advisors have classed it in there words &#8216;less harmful And addictive than caffeine! Come on British government, we are all getting quote insulted with your lack of knowledge on this subject dispite the evidence by &#8216;professionals&#8217; at your finger tips! We are also so SICK of the fact you take us for idiots!!!!!! Wake up you cretins!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynnie Heal</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnie Heal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[government do not want to help anyone other than themselves]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>government do not want to help anyone other than themselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeking advice from the ACMD ! Are they taking the pee? from what I remember the ACMD &quot;advised&quot; the HS to leave Cannabis as class C but the HS still reclassified it as B.
Also our drug laws are applied with pressure from UN treaties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeking advice from the ACMD ! Are they taking the pee? from what I remember the ACMD &#8220;advised&#8221; the HS to leave Cannabis as class C but the HS still reclassified it as B.<br />
Also our drug laws are applied with pressure from UN treaties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=6630507.PN.&amp;OS=PN/6630507&amp;RS=PN/6630507
Our government believe&#039;s America when it comes to warmongering, why is it they choose not to believe them when it comes to medicine?
I&#039;m not sure what the significance of this patent is but at least they can&#039;t say that everyone is as myopic as the UK when it comes to Cannabis as medicine.
You might want to send this link to Mr Cameron Peter.He has still to retract the lie&#039;s which he spewed on Al Jazeera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=6630507.PN.&#038;OS=PN/6630507&#038;RS=PN/6630507" rel="nofollow">http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=6630507.PN.&#038;OS=PN/6630507&#038;RS=PN/6630507</a><br />
Our government believe&#8217;s America when it comes to warmongering, why is it they choose not to believe them when it comes to medicine?<br />
I&#8217;m not sure what the significance of this patent is but at least they can&#8217;t say that everyone is as myopic as the UK when it comes to Cannabis as medicine.<br />
You might want to send this link to Mr Cameron Peter.He has still to retract the lie&#8217;s which he spewed on Al Jazeera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Anthony Hegarty</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Anthony Hegarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha, don&#039;t be so easy to vote for the libs! They do stuff like this all the time because they know they need the student votes, as soon as they get them they disregard everything they ever said about cannabis. I remember the last general election, old cleggy was bantering on about coffee shops and how they could work in the uk, so stupid old me went straight out and voted! I won&#039;t be doing that again, I assure you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, don&#8217;t be so easy to vote for the libs! They do stuff like this all the time because they know they need the student votes, as soon as they get them they disregard everything they ever said about cannabis. I remember the last general election, old cleggy was bantering on about coffee shops and how they could work in the uk, so stupid old me went straight out and voted! I won&#8217;t be doing that again, I assure you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripsidaisy</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripsidaisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[even better news that the libdems want to deriminalise all drugs .... how its works i&#039;m too stoned to work out, but it is good news that a political party that is nominally in control of the vote in the house...........wants to let the country as a whole save billions on policing, prison, court actions, etc,..... come on , lets call for an election now. lets all the stoners at least, as well as all the peolple that would medicate for their own needs, all vote for libdem..........blah blah.....stoned ;p
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even better news that the libdems want to deriminalise all drugs &#8230;. how its works i&#8217;m too stoned to work out, but it is good news that a political party that is nominally in control of the vote in the house&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..wants to let the country as a whole save billions on policing, prison, court actions, etc,&#8230;.. come on , lets call for an election now. lets all the stoners at least, as well as all the peolple that would medicate for their own needs, all vote for libdem&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.blah blah&#8230;..stoned ;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanj_chow</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanj_chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome news Peter, this confirms exactly what I&#039;d heard but just needed to see it in black and white. My local Tory MP, who has been speaking to the Department of Health and the Home Office on my behalf, had also fobbed me off with the excuse that the 2008 ACMD report had not highlighted any medical benefits from cannabis.

This will prove that the system is constructed to deny people any hope of medicating themselves legitimately, the government has been willful in its ignorance and attempts to keep others ignorant too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome news Peter, this confirms exactly what I&#8217;d heard but just needed to see it in black and white. My local Tory MP, who has been speaking to the Department of Health and the Home Office on my behalf, had also fobbed me off with the excuse that the 2008 ACMD report had not highlighted any medical benefits from cannabis.</p>
<p>This will prove that the system is constructed to deny people any hope of medicating themselves legitimately, the government has been willful in its ignorance and attempts to keep others ignorant too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Bimble</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Bimble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaporizors are the bomb - I always head for coffeeshops with them when I&#039;m in Dam.

And you don&#039;t need to spend a fortune - I&#039;ve seen people use hot air guns to good effect.

The problem is the government have got you by the short &amp; curlies - Assuming you manage to grow your &quot;Herbal cannabis&quot; without getting caught then the current laws almost force you into consuming it in the most unhealty method.

Because if you convert it into Hash, cannabis oil or cannabutter then the penalties are greater than they are with herbal cannabis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaporizors are the bomb &#8211; I always head for coffeeshops with them when I&#8217;m in Dam.</p>
<p>And you don&#8217;t need to spend a fortune &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen people use hot air guns to good effect.</p>
<p>The problem is the government have got you by the short &amp; curlies &#8211; Assuming you manage to grow your &#8220;Herbal cannabis&#8221; without getting caught then the current laws almost force you into consuming it in the most unhealty method.</p>
<p>Because if you convert it into Hash, cannabis oil or cannabutter then the penalties are greater than they are with herbal cannabis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.google.com/patents?id=0pcNAAAAEBAJ&amp;printsec=abstract#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false
Keep it up Jason, and I hope you feel better.
These people remind me of naughty children who protest their innocence when asked &#039;who ate all the chocolate Ice cream...?&#039; 
Even while holding a dripping spoon and an empty tub of Ben and Jerry&#039;s with their faces covered in chocolate Ice cream, they still protest their innocence!
They are trying to give us the runabout.
The irony is that they are doing most of the running about!
The phrase headless chickens springs to mind.
Unfortunately even if you provide evidence of effective medical herbal Cannabis use they would just ignore it.
I have photo&#039;s of my blood pressure without Cannabis:Circa 150/110
With Cannabis:120/86!
To most people that and the fact that I physically as well as mentally feel better would be pretty good evidence.To them it&#039;s an uncomfortable truth needing to be obscured with rhetoric and red tape.
Herbal Cannabis does not put money into the drug companies pockets.
Sativex does, at a huge cost to the patient as no pct will pick up the tab and so a private prescription is the way to extort money from the sick.
Then they punish those with the fortitude of self preservation to grow their own medicine.
Obscene!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=0pcNAAAAEBAJ&#038;printsec=abstract#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents?id=0pcNAAAAEBAJ&#038;printsec=abstract#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false</a><br />
Keep it up Jason, and I hope you feel better.<br />
These people remind me of naughty children who protest their innocence when asked &#8216;who ate all the chocolate Ice cream&#8230;?&#8217; <br />
Even while holding a dripping spoon and an empty tub of Ben and Jerry&#8217;s with their faces covered in chocolate Ice cream, they still protest their innocence!<br />
They are trying to give us the runabout.<br />
The irony is that they are doing most of the running about!<br />
The phrase headless chickens springs to mind.<br />
Unfortunately even if you provide evidence of effective medical herbal Cannabis use they would just ignore it.<br />
I have photo&#8217;s of my blood pressure without Cannabis:Circa 150/110<br />
With Cannabis:120/86!<br />
To most people that and the fact that I physically as well as mentally feel better would be pretty good evidence.To them it&#8217;s an uncomfortable truth needing to be obscured with rhetoric and red tape.<br />
Herbal Cannabis does not put money into the drug companies pockets.<br />
Sativex does, at a huge cost to the patient as no pct will pick up the tab and so a private prescription is the way to extort money from the sick.<br />
Then they punish those with the fortitude of self preservation to grow their own medicine.<br />
Obscene!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxwood</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am glad you guys brought up this issue of &quot;smoked&quot; versus &quot;vaped&quot; cannabis.  The embarrassing truth about &quot;one-hitters&quot; is, I believe, that they are actually cheap, easily hand-made vapourisers-- so nobody need be deterred by the high cost of a Volcano (though if you can afford it that is the way to go).  Please visit wikiHow.com: &quot;How to Make Smoke Pipes from Everyday Objects&quot;, review, sign in and edit, improve, pictorialize the article and others related to it concerning sifting herbs for smoking use, how to make a crater screen etc.

Now as it happens this understanding that every one-hitter is a vapouriser dawned on me only very recently after the articles referenced above were started, and it will now be time to retitle them and to provide proper instruction on what is meant by vapourising with a one-hitter (which consists of holding a lighter flame far enough-- 2 cm-- below the utensil opening that the air entering upon the herb particles is 200C/392F and truly vapourises the cannabinoids out-- making the herbal material turn somewhat darker-- before letting anything catch on fire: &quot;Suck Slow; Don&#039;t Glow!).  

When masses of users (10-mil. in UK?) catch on to this, the &quot;joint&quot; (often a mixture with addictive tobacco) and the 6,000,000-deaths-a-year tobacco $igarette will be history.  This is why the tobacco $igarette industry has been funding politicians who &quot;crack down&quot; on cannabis.

We&#039;ll then not be caught up in the time-honoured debate over &quot;smoked cannabis&quot; because the entire &quot;smoking&quot; issue is obsolete.  There is NOTHING in &quot;smoke&quot; worth inhaling.  Lord Russell, who lived to age 98, didn&#039;t inhale from his pipe nor do most pipe and cigar &quot;smokers&quot;; they enjoy the combustion &quot;taste&quot; of strong noninhaleable tobaccos while absorbing some nicotine into the brain through the mucous membranes.  Users of either cannabis or tobacco who inhale will be best advised to reject hot burning overdose $igarette paper and switch to safer inhalant equipment; here is where the new TOKEPURE second point, PIPESAFE needs especial support, so that no one will be punished for possessing a SAFER but LESS EASY TO HIDE service utensil (demeaningly known among prohibs heretofore as &quot;paraphernalia&quot;). 

Instead of &quot;roll your own&quot;, then, let the word henceforth be: &quot;MAKE YOUR OWN!&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad you guys brought up this issue of &#8220;smoked&#8221; versus &#8220;vaped&#8221; cannabis.  The embarrassing truth about &#8220;one-hitters&#8221; is, I believe, that they are actually cheap, easily hand-made vapourisers&#8211; so nobody need be deterred by the high cost of a Volcano (though if you can afford it that is the way to go).  Please visit wikiHow.com: &#8220;How to Make Smoke Pipes from Everyday Objects&#8221;, review, sign in and edit, improve, pictorialize the article and others related to it concerning sifting herbs for smoking use, how to make a crater screen etc.</p>
<p>Now as it happens this understanding that every one-hitter is a vapouriser dawned on me only very recently after the articles referenced above were started, and it will now be time to retitle them and to provide proper instruction on what is meant by vapourising with a one-hitter (which consists of holding a lighter flame far enough&#8211; 2 cm&#8211; below the utensil opening that the air entering upon the herb particles is 200C/392F and truly vapourises the cannabinoids out&#8211; making the herbal material turn somewhat darker&#8211; before letting anything catch on fire: &#8220;Suck Slow; Don&#8217;t Glow!).  </p>
<p>When masses of users (10-mil. in UK?) catch on to this, the &#8220;joint&#8221; (often a mixture with addictive tobacco) and the 6,000,000-deaths-a-year tobacco $igarette will be history.  This is why the tobacco $igarette industry has been funding politicians who &#8220;crack down&#8221; on cannabis.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll then not be caught up in the time-honoured debate over &#8220;smoked cannabis&#8221; because the entire &#8220;smoking&#8221; issue is obsolete.  There is NOTHING in &#8220;smoke&#8221; worth inhaling.  Lord Russell, who lived to age 98, didn&#8217;t inhale from his pipe nor do most pipe and cigar &#8220;smokers&#8221;; they enjoy the combustion &#8220;taste&#8221; of strong noninhaleable tobaccos while absorbing some nicotine into the brain through the mucous membranes.  Users of either cannabis or tobacco who inhale will be best advised to reject hot burning overdose $igarette paper and switch to safer inhalant equipment; here is where the new TOKEPURE second point, PIPESAFE needs especial support, so that no one will be punished for possessing a SAFER but LESS EASY TO HIDE service utensil (demeaningly known among prohibs heretofore as &#8220;paraphernalia&#8221;). </p>
<p>Instead of &#8220;roll your own&#8221;, then, let the word henceforth be: &#8220;MAKE YOUR OWN!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiya Alan.  Thanks for the well wishes!  

You&#039;re right in what you say of course, the biggest hindrance to issue is how it&#039;s consumed.  If you speak to any professor that knows cannabinoids (off the record of course) they will all indirectly lead you to the conclusion that vaporising is the best method, can get very good results, and has a higher safety rating than smoked.

It&#039;s a tricky subject as the whole point off cannabinoid medication tends to be the self empowerment of it all, and the free ability to titrate safely compared to other medications.  Smoked cannabis works well for many people, so it&#039;s a hard subject to navigate around. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Alan.  Thanks for the well wishes!  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right in what you say of course, the biggest hindrance to issue is how it&#8217;s consumed.  If you speak to any professor that knows cannabinoids (off the record of course) they will all indirectly lead you to the conclusion that vaporising is the best method, can get very good results, and has a higher safety rating than smoked.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tricky subject as the whole point off cannabinoid medication tends to be the self empowerment of it all, and the free ability to titrate safely compared to other medications.  Smoked cannabis works well for many people, so it&#8217;s a hard subject to navigate around. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan duncan.</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>alan duncan.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see ur well j and still fighting the good fight.

The main stumbling block I can see is &#039;delivery method&#039; , for some reason government insists on pigeon-hole-ing as &#039;evil when smoked&#039;
How about everyone promises not to smoke it, in the same way the general public are trusted not to drink enuf to kill ourselves when we goto pubs.

Or is there figures published already detailing tar per 0.1g ?
Maybe even a list of vap&#039;s....


 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see ur well j and still fighting the good fight.</p>
<p>The main stumbling block I can see is &#8216;delivery method&#8217; , for some reason government insists on pigeon-hole-ing as &#8216;evil when smoked&#8217;<br />
How about everyone promises not to smoke it, in the same way the general public are trusted not to drink enuf to kill ourselves when we goto pubs.</p>
<p>Or is there figures published already detailing tar per 0.1g ?<br />
Maybe even a list of vap&#8217;s&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Sanj,

The rest didn&#039;t quite work out, but am fully taking next week off instead.  Good to hear you&#039;re refreshed!

Good work on that front too, I think we&#039;ve well and truly got them bang to rights over this, keep it up Sanj!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sanj,</p>
<p>The rest didn&#8217;t quite work out, but am fully taking next week off instead.  Good to hear you&#8217;re refreshed!</p>
<p>Good work on that front too, I think we&#8217;ve well and truly got them bang to rights over this, keep it up Sanj!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry, too many things going on at once.  I stand fully corrected! hehe
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, too many things going on at once.  I stand fully corrected! hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.clear-uk.org/freedom-of-information-request-re-mr-camerons-comments-on-medicinal-cannabis/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clear-uk.org/?p=1968#comment-771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;dam&lt;/i&gt; of untruths ... &lt;i&gt;damned&lt;/i&gt; untruths:-)
@pedantry ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a <i>dam</i> of untruths &#8230; <i>damned</i> untruths:-)<br />
@pedantry </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
