01 Oct 2016

‘This House Would Legalise Cannabis’. Reynolds v Hitchens. University Of Southampton, 29th September 2016.

  Video Coming Soon. A vote was taken before the debate started: For the proposition: 49  Against the proposition: 18  Abstain/undecided: 17 John Pritchard, studying economics. For the proposition. Jacob Power, studying philosophy. Against the proposition. Peter Reynolds, CLEAR Cannabis Law Reform. For the proposition. Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday. Against the proposition. A vote was taken after the debate finished: For the proposition: 57  Against the proposition: 26  Abstain/undecided: 8 My speech I start with an assertion that I think we can all agree on - the...