Why Is Cannabis Still Prohibited In Britain?

    Dr Geoffrey Guy, the only legal skunk farmer in Britain

    Well, to be strictly accurate, it isn’t.

    Since June 2010, Sativex, GW Pharmaceuticals’ super-strong, super-concentrated, 51% THC tincture of skunk cannabis has been available on prescription.

    Sativex is the only exception though and the way it has been licensed is a demonstration of the dishonesty, corruption and deceit at the heart of the UK government.  The Home Office and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) are involved in a calculated attempt to misinform and mislead the public that Sativex is not cannabis.  GW sponsored doctors, scientists and nurses promote the lie that there is no “high”  from the use of Sativex, even though the statutory product documentation describes “euphoric mood” as a “common” side effect.

    Recently the results of phase III trials of Sativex showed that:

     “…the tolerability profile of this medicine is favourable, with limited relevant adverse effects and – particularly reassuring – the drug does not appear to lead to withdrawal effects if patients suddenly stop using it.” (Professor H.P. Hartung, Chair of Neurology at Heinrich-Heine University)

    Yet the UK government continues to repeat the blatant untruth that “…there is no medicinal value in cannabis “ and that it is “..a harmful drug with a number of acute and chronic health effects.” – just bluster, obfuscation and nonsense

    So, back to the question.  What are the reasons?  Why is cannabis still banned when all the scientific, medical, intellectual, moral and public health arguments have been won?

    This is why weed is banned

    The reasons that cannabis remains prohibited in the UK are:

    1. The power of the alcohol lobby

    Fronted by The Portman Group, a shadowy, incredibly wealthy lobbying organisation, the alcohol industry is terrified of a cheap, safe alternative to its poisonous products, the most dangerous and harmful drug of all.  In fact, there’s room for both.  Under a rational and responsible  system of regulation, all drugs would be controlled in proportion to the harm they cause.

    2. The power of the US prohibition industry

    Hypocrisy In A Spliff

    When alcohol prohibition ended in 1933, there was already a massive infrastructure and that was transferred directly to  ”marijuana”, the racist term coined to demonise cannabis.  That grew and expanded into the DEA, which has become an out of control international gangster organisation, and the huge industry of private prisons.  There are hundreds of thousands of jobs in the US that depend on the prohibition of cannabis.  Even enthusiastic cannabis users like President Obama have sold their integrity and honour for the  sake of prohibition.  Woe betide the country, whatever the “special relationship”, that goes against the US.

    3. The Daily Mail campaign of lies, distortion and forged scientific evidence

    The Daily Mail has waged a disinformation campaign concerning cannabis for more than 10 years.  It publishes lies, exaggeration, falsified scientific evidence and, its favourite trick is to associate cannabis as often as it can with violent and bloodthirsty crimes, however tenuous the link.  Paul Dacre, the “butcher”, as he is known in the newspaper world, made a corrupt agreement with Gordon Brown to upgrade cannabis back to a class B drug in return for supporting the worst prime minister in British history.  He has no regard for the truth, for evidence or for the suffering his vile newspaper causes.

    4. Corrupt and cowardly politicans

    Gordon Brown said “skunk is lethal”.  Alan Johnson sacked Professor David Nutt for telling the truth about cannabis being far safer than alcohol.  Charles Walker said cocaine is safer for children than cannabis.  Nadine Dorries said one spliff will ruin a child’s education for ever.  David Cameron, like Obama an enthusiastic smoker when younger, defines hypocrisy and dishonesty in his attitude to cannabis.

    5. The unlawful monopoly of medicinal cannabis granted to GW Pharmaceuticals.

    The Home Office is engaged in a corrupt relationship with GW Pharmaceuticals.  It conspires with GW to misinform the public about Sativex and about the true value of cannabis.  It refuses freedom of information requests about all aspects of its underhand and dishonest dealings on the subject.  Home Office policy on cannabis causes direct harm to thousands of UK citizens and fraudulently lines the pockets of GW shareholders.

    Super-Strong, Super-Concentrated, 51% THC Tincture Of Cannabis

    6.  The self-destructive behaviour of cannabis campaigners

    For years the cannabis campaign has shot itself in the foot by promoting its cause as an “alternative” or “sub” culture.  Irresponsible “demos” and marches have had precisely the opposite effect on public attitudes to that intended.  Stoners or big time smugglers are the last people we need fronting the campaign.  Public displays of cannabis smoking are childish and counterproductive.  CLEAR has moved the campaign onto a new level of professionalism and evidence-based argument but we have suffered jealous attacks from those who cannot campaign effectively themselves and so seek to sabotage or hijack our work.

    "You cannot sustain a lie like this for ever". Professor Lester Grinspoon

    These are the reasons that cannabis remains prohibited in Britain but there is hope.

    Determined, evidence-based campaigning.

    Relentless pursuit of the truth and confrontation of lies.

    Responsible, civilised, reasonable argument.

    The truth will become CLEAR.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1357650124 Sean Curran

      this is the truth!!! thanks Peter!!!

    • maxwood

      Your list is well done, one suggestion I’d make is: Big 2WackGo belongs at the top, ahead of alcohol.  Press release, May 30, 2011, by Douglas Bettcher at WHO: tobacco (almost certainly meaning mostly $igarettes) 6,000,000 deaths a year; alcohol in 2nd place with 2.5 million.  All the rest about how they fear the competitive Alternative Herb holds true for $igarettes as for alcohol.  But there’s a connection, too:

      The $igarette marketing ”industry” counts on BINGE-DRINKING as a recruitment tool to get youths hooked on nicotine!

      1.  To counter tough urban school bullying a kid has to “belong” to a gang with buddies to defend him, and to get in the group you must show you can drink like a man, i.e. drain as many beers as the other guys do, at some party;

      2.  Someone will doubtless offer you a $igarette or a “joint” with nicotine tobacckgo mixed in;

      3.  You’ll inhale “side-stream” smoke while drinking;

      4.  Someone will advise you to try a $igarette or two to chase away a headache or hangover;

      5.  A $igarette or two will clear your head (sorry, Dr. Freud) so you can drive the car home;

      6.  Couple of days later $igarette nicotine may help you to stay up all night, last-minute cramming for the Big Test…

      7.  ZAP!  Hooked for life!  2-3 decades at $$thousands a year for $igarettes, then Big pHARMa cleans up with sales of Lipitor ($11-b./year) etc.

      Anecdote: in the 1980′s Gorbachev wanted to give Socialism a chance to do something really important, like SHUT DOWN ALCOHOLISM IN THE SOVIET UNION.   The Pack Industry asked their stooges Ronald “Chesterfield is my Cigarette” Reagan, Margaret “Tobacco Institute” Thatcher and John Paul “Art Treasures of the Vatican Exhibition Sponsored by Philip Morris” II to step in, and they bankrupted the Soviet Union out from under Gorby and put in the notorious lush Yeltsin instead.  Male life expectancy in Russia declined a cou;le years in the next decade etc. (congratulations, fellows); today according to one website, 8% of govt. revenues in Russia are dependent on the $igarette tax (almost as bad as Pac(k)istan, 10%).

       

    • Focusonpeace

      “You cannot sustain a lie like this for ever”. Professor Lester GrinspoonCouldnt of put it better myself 

    • georgeclear

      Man, is anyone bored yet, why can’t the UK government step up and just admit that their predecessors were wrong and that people like Prof Nutt and Grinspoon are right. Not to mention California, Portugal, etc. It’s OBVIOUS to ANYONE with half a brain and half a life, it really is. 

      Broken promises are part of politics, we all know that, I had high hopes for the Lib Dems this time around.. after-all they did manage to get into power to some extent which is a huge achievement for them.. I haven’t got the bookmark anymore but they were all for the Dutch coffee shop type method shortly before they gained power with Mr Sleezeball Cameron. Does Clegg really have no voice at all in this country, how can he just sit in silence in the background, the guy is a waste of space and to be frank (no pun intended) a disgrace for wasting such a *HUGE* opportunity to bring the Lib Dems to the forefront. I know I’m slightly off topic but why is this “leader”, who is on our side, doing nothing at all to lead after all this time. Have CLEAR had any worthwhile dialogue with the Lib Dems?

      While I’m on here, Peter: you are fantastic and please keep up the good work.. the difference that you are making is tangible. We will win. And I for one completely and 100% agree with your policies and tactics.

      One last point,  I see today that Birmingham police have decided on another crackdown on Cannabis farmers.. despite the new sentencing laws (are the coppers on the beat even ***king aware of the law).. http://www.birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2012/06/02/police-on-cannabis-raids-in-harborne-and-quinton-97319-31096569/  ”Operation Sativa” .. FOR GOD’S SAKE. NONSENSE.

    • cshaws

      But cannabis is Class B Schedule 1 – no legitimate medical purpose.  Schedule 1 drugs (Coca Leaf, Mescaline, Cannabis (all plants) and LSD) cannot be legally prescribed or possessed by practitioners.  Only drugs with a schedule (other than 1) under the MoDA can be legally prescribed by doctors unless they have a special licence from the HO, that is my understanding.  But Sativex has no schedule under MoDA.  The HO wish to give it a Schedule 4 but can’t because trade names cannot be scheduled, only the contents can be scheduled. So, technically, even Sativex is prohibited and doctors who prescribe it are, in reality according to the letter of the law, are guilty of supplying a banned substance and should face 14 years incarceration.  However Sativex is singled out and is being supplied on a “…named patient basis under Home Office licence for medicinal purposes”  - in other words if you are friends with the HO and you cannot operate within the current law they will invent a new one for you.  

    • http://www.peter-reynolds.co.uk Peter Reynolds

      To be accurate, the HO has issued an “open general licence” for Sativex to allow it to be manufactured, prescribed, dispensed and possessed so yes, they invented a law to suit themselves and presumably they could keep that going for as long as they want.  If they re-schedule it as just THC/CBD then we have to find a way of mounting a legal challenge.  Maybe they’ll just do nothing?

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/5B4X6DMPLW3V3LVGJOSK6JJCTI Skott

      i would like to say the government Does recognise medical cannabis as you can use this as mitigating circumstances in court if you have your weed stolen by the armed thugs called the police, so as always the government putting out confusing signals to its own people.  My advice to anyone is to keep doing what you do best and stick two fingers up to the wankers who have no idea about what really going on in the  cannabis world. We will never surrender to thugs  or politicians and we will all keep smoking cannabis and there is not a thing you (Government)  can do so give up, as people power will win. Goodbye cameron,  labour will be in next and at least they are prepared to downgrade (blair) and the upgrade (brown from scotland which is a differant country and shouldnt of been prime minister).  Me personally will never stop till the day I die and hopefully I will be stoned when I do. If anyone gets caught regarding cannabis go not guilty as if G.W. can grow then everyone else can as you cant say to one person or collective you can grow and then tell over 1  million people you cant. Fuck you,if its good for them its good for us. we will never give up

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/5B4X6DMPLW3V3LVGJOSK6JJCTI Skott

      p.s. does anyone know anyone who has taken or been presrcibed sativex as i dont know anyone and if it contains 51% thc i see that as stronger than any plant on the planet as the strong strains contain 25%. Also if there is no high why do you have to take your initail sprays with a nurse or doctor.LIES,LIES and more LIES

    • steve a

      A quick run round with google finds no paralympian steeplechasers from the UK using it. Which is hardly surprising when you consider the height, number and spacing of the hurdles that need to be vaulted. 

      This was a nice article I thought.
      http://www.thctalk.com/cannabis-forum/showthread.php?37940-Access-to-Sativex

    • cshaws

      Interestingly the MHRA first claimed that Sativex was “ the product is derived from elements in the cannabis plant, rather than the cannabis plant itself, it should be clear therefore that Sativex is not “cannabis’ ” in tresponse to an FOI request by Laurel Bush.  I initially challenged this statement and the MHRA agreed that Sativex is made up from THC and CBD and “….
       It also contains other cannabinoids and plant constituents extracted from the Cannabis leaves and flowers, in minor amounts….”  which basically means its constituents are roughly the same as herbal cannabis.  But they added that 
        ”…..The process is controlled to remove impurities to a level that assures the purity and safety of the final extract….. “ 
      So the harmful element of cannabis would appear to be these ‘impurities’ removed in processing.  I then raised an FOI request asking what these impurities are as there is no reference to them on the GW website. Their response to this FOI totally contradicted their statement about the removal of these mysterious harmful impurities and stated that Sativex actually still contains these ‘impurities’ and they know what they are.  In fact they hold documentation listing these harmful impurities !  But they won’t release this information because ” …..The MHRA does hold a list of impurities contained in Sativex oromucosal Spray (PL 18024/0009). However, this information is exempt from release under Section 43 of the FOIA (Commercial interests). We believe that the release of this information into the public domain would aid a competitor company’s product development such that they would be able to get a similar product to market quicker and at less cost….”.  So there you go. the authority whose underlying remit is  ”Safeguarding Public Health” has stated that Sativex contains all the same chemicals as the herb it is made from, including the harmful elements of cannabis.  They know precisely what these harmful impurities are (so how harmful can they be?) but they won’t tell the public (us) what they are because it will compromise the commercial viability of the company that produces cannabis extract called Sativex.  Unless I’m missing something that basically says that Sativex is Cannabis in a bottle, it contains some secret, mysterious impurities which are harmful but not harmful enough to warrant a warning on the bottle or to warrant warning the international cannabis community of their potential harmful effects.    Sativex is Cannabis according to the MHRA – QED.

      PS. I wonder if they have told the Home Office?

      (The correspondence in full is here  :  http://www.clear-uk.org/the-sativex-scam-becomes-a-scandal/ ) 

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/5B4X6DMPLW3V3LVGJOSK6JJCTI Skott

      the only safe medicine is organic in my opinion, not some drug that has been raped by by people who know nothing about cannabis referring to G.W. pharma , politicians and worryingly the police and not forgetting the worst paper in the country
       THE DAILY (bullshit) MAIL you get more truth out of the sunday sport than the criminal offenders mentioned. Just remember these people WANT your children on the streets selling drugs,gives them something to talk about when they are in the savoy drinking 100£ cups of tea on our hard earned taxpayers money. Lets get Labour back at least they listen now and again lol lib dems are too spineless and the tories want us poor people addicted to fags and alcohol as all there uni mates are making millions out of our suffering and death. Its our choice what we tipple in as long as it dont affect others or create victims. p.s. im not a Labour supporter but I think they will officially recognise medical marijuana long before them tories and as lib dems will never be in power it would be like flogging a dead horse voting for those fools. also sorry about bad spelling, langauge and bad puns. keep the peace and love to you all

    • Focusonpeace

      I think we need to hit GW pharma with the freedom of information act

    • venom2255

      cannabis may cause a mental health problem that would be miner in comparison to a PTS syndrome gained from war a soldier is a killing machine ,so the gov are saying this killing machine who has seen his mates die in there arms , people blown up. is safer than a weed smoker

    • steve a

       I agree, the scabs are so big and fresh they just invite being picked and when we do who knows what fresh lies will make up the putrid puss we find beneath.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/5B4X6DMPLW3V3LVGJOSK6JJCTI Skott

      i would like to add something inflammatory and that is the powers that be want children on the streets dealing drugs as its a big money spinner for them. They want poor people killing each other and being locked up. Thats the government way. They dont care about us  as if they did cannabis would be legal and people wouldnt be losing loved ones round the world through beheadings and other sick methods of murder. As venom has said about killing machines, we can add cars, planes, trains, people, dogs, snakes,lions,Daily mail  and the most dangerous thing to mankind asteroids and the sun. the one in the sky lol All these are much more dangerous than cannabis as these kill millions each year, so why are these not banned, because all their (government) pals are in the industries that produce potential death

    • Focusonpeace

      I know its off subject, But everyone must watch this vid

      Its the trailer for the new strain hunters expedition, and shows cannabis how it should be, growing in the wild…Take a look! :D

       http://www.growhd.tv/video/Strain-Hunters-Swaziland-/ac27c7cc6cd0bfa26b5c5c76c8edc652

    • Focusonpeace

      What I dont understand is the only thing that separates GW Pharma’s extracted Cannabis with herbal cannabis are these mysterious impurities herbal cannabis supposedly has. Yes i agree we need to pick at the scams until they bleed with information. 

    • steve a

       I wonder if it is not worth pursuing the line of what it isn’t and by Holmesian logic eliminate everything else until whatever it is that is left must be what the fuss is all about.

       

    • georgeclear

      It’s prohibited partly because of this type of badly written article! 

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18283689

      Shame on the BBC for not checking it properly…  It’s not the damn Cannabis causing the harm they cite it’s the fact that there is no filter protecting the person from the TOBACCO!! The tobacco is the major harm causer.

    • venom2255

      id like to know does big dave think prince harry in 2002 was smoking average weed ! he had the best 

    • venom2255

      there was talk about e-petitions not having enough votes we need more advertising but there is a counter vote to keep it illegal. if the old cronies with nothing better to than poke there noses in things they know nothing about they may out weigh the legalise side. i would say if we can get call of duty to advertise e-petitions online might help expediently 

    • Focusonpeace

      Done my complaint :)     funny how studies already done directly contradict what they say.

    • Focusonpeace

      I also think its a matter of cannabis users medicinal or recreational, who are afraid to type in their information because they fear arrest and are uneasy telling people their medication and or relaxant of choice. I know many cannabis users, who know all the facts and dismiss propaganda with laughter, yet they stick their head in the sand when it comes to the politics. They simply dont want to know. 
      Advertising is definitely needed, im sure if this was a state in America there would be a bill board some where with the E-petition URL on show encouraging people to make a decision. 

    • venom2255

      the bcc do a survey on weed in a country where it is illegal its not right .the government if you ask the government about weed its like asking hitler  what he thought  of people with different colour skin  

    • steve a

      focusonpeace:

      Were this America there would likely be bullet holes in the billboard too.

      Our society is British and in the same way as we prefer our advertising hoardings to slowly rot away in the early summer damp, on the civilised side of the pond we take a much more measured approach and we complain.

      It may be it needs more of us to complain that at present but complaining is what we do and we should continue to do it.

    • Focusonpeace

      Good comparison 

    • Focusonpeace

      And, while we complain…Advertising?…billboards? Hopefully without the bullet holes…although if the billboards are anywhere near Camden…lol

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Bayley/1446977178 Stephen Bayley

      I completely agree right up to number 6. Public displays of marijuana use, marches, rallies, etc are to be used in tandem with political maneuverings like campaigning and petitioning. We can’t accept societies stigma as our own and still have credibility. We either 100% believe in what we are doing or we are hypocrites!

      So I say light up a joint in every alleyway, every street corner and every public gathering. We must send society the message that smoking cannabis is perfectly acceptable and normal.

    • ChristopherSawtell

      Why is cannabis still prohibited in Britain?

      There are still many Good Christian Puritans in the co-joined twins of the Church of England and the Government of the United Kingdom. These people will fight tooth and nail to proscribe any activity which could be described in any way as being pleasurable just for the sake of it.

      Thus ingesting a substance to alter the state of mind from one of misery to one of euphoria is seen as the Ultimate Sin of Hedonism, from which said Puritans think they have a God given duty to protect people who might happen to suffer the misfortune of living in the less fortunate layers of the British social structure.

      But why is alcohol exempted?

      Because Jesus is reported as having turned water into wine.

      In my opinion, while probably not fully thought through by said Puritans, the reason for the Prohibition of cannabis is, fundamentally, as simple as that.

    • isoprop

      seriously? even CLEAR calling all weed “skunk” now? save this ridiculous term for the Daily Mail.

    • Focusonpeace

      The term “skunk” has been misappropriated and used very effectively by certain sections of society to caricature, demonise and distance cannabis from the mildly psychoactive plant that it actually is.

      The deliberate and specious differentiation between skunk and cannabis seeks to create the myth that it is a separate and more dangerous substance than the one that most people know of and to give it some sort of bogeyman status. The truth: skunk is cannabis.

      It is a strain of cannabis bred by the Dutch in the 1980s, originally called “skunk#1″. Since then, hundreds of different strains have been created, all of which have different growing characteristics, strengths, flavours and names. These are not skunk. To name all unpollinated female flowers of the cannabis plant under a catch-all agenda-laden media-friendly label is at best doing the growers a disservice, at worst blatantly lying to serve an ulterior motive. After all, the practice of separating the male plants from the females to produce “sinsemilla” (meaning without seeds) in order to potentiate the active ingredients has been around long before the 1980s. It is nothing new. Similarly, strawberry growers discourage “runners” from forming as they cause the plant to put less energy into fruiting.

      This kind of growing is no different to the use of F1 hybrid seeds by the average gardener to increase crop yield, aid resistance to disease or improve flavour of everyday crops like carrots or tomatoes. But I guess if you have an agenda to push, then, from the prohibitionist point of view, “mind-bending super-potent drug scourge” works better than “selectively bred cross-pollinated plant”.
      http://www.uk420.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=133483